StockFetcher Forums · General Discussion · POLITICS GOES HERE<< 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 ... 75 >>Post Follow-up
TheRumpledOne
6,358 posts
msg #91942
Ignore TheRumpledOne
5/2/2010 5:32:19 PM

INALIENABLE RIGHTS COME BEFORE ALL LAWS OF THE LAND.

====================================================

Really?

And who determines what are INALIENABLE RIGHTS?

chetron
2,817 posts
msg #91948
Ignore chetron
5/2/2010 7:17:08 PM

YOU ARE THE ONE THAT POSTED IT, DON'T YOU READ WHAT YOU POST?

alf44
2,025 posts
msg #91950
Ignore alf44
modified
5/2/2010 9:04:23 PM

TRO,

Surely YOU don't need to be reminded that... uhhh ... hello ...


YOU ... "Avery T. Horton" (aka. TheRumpledOne) ... ARE a BLACK MAN ... uhhh ... LIVING ... IN freakin' Arizona ...

YOU are apparently ... in favor of a LAW ... IN YOUR OWN DAMN STATE ... that is blatantly racially discriminatory ...


YOU are apparently ... publically confessing your support of a law ... for what is ... at it's core ... "Racial Profiling" !!!

----

As a MAN ... a BLACK MAN ... how can YOU possibly be in favor of this racially biased law ?

For God's sake, man ... how do YOU frickin' sleep at night ?

Do YOU have a conscience ?

-----

I'm old enough to remember ... segregated Schools !

I'm old enough to remember ... Black and White sections at the movie theatre !

I'm old enough to remember ... Black and White water fountains !


I am outraged at this "law" ... and ... uhhh ... for the record ... I'm a white guy !

-----

That YOU ... a "black" man ... are not outraged by this "racially discriminatory law" ... is ...

EVEN for a misguided buffoon like YOU ... frankly ... SCHOCKING !!!


YOU should be ashamed of yourself !!! imo

-----

I'm done ... respond if you like ... I won't !!!


You're pathetic !!!



TheRumpledOne
6,358 posts
msg #91956
Ignore TheRumpledOne
modified
5/3/2010 1:29:47 AM

First, I bet you have NEVER read the law.

Second, the law enables the police to enforce the FEDERAL LAW. If the FEDERAL LAW was racist, then it would have been challenged in court.

Third, my race, color, creed, sex, religion, etc... has nothing to do with my wanting the law to be enforced. This debate is about the law not about me. Quit trying to kill the messenger.

Fourth, you won't respond because you can not with this argument with logic or fact.






Eman93
4,572 posts
msg #91957
Ignore Eman93
5/3/2010 2:01:58 AM



machismo
115 posts
msg #91958
Ignore machismo
5/3/2010 2:26:30 AM

The law has already been amended and reduced to a lesser fine and investigate immigration status incident to a "lawful stop, detention, or arrest,Arizona HB2162. I am sure challenges to the law must be already in process(not the first law thats ever challenged). But if anyone can say they are citizen and thus avoid the whole enforcement of the law then what difference will it make, surely citizens of instate and outstate are not required to carry their citizenship papers. And I think Chet was referring to this thread by TRO, maybe ???

SHOW ME YOUR PAPERS

http://forums.stockfetcher.com/sfforums/?q=view&fid=1001&tid=87239&qrid=&isiframe=

chetron
2,817 posts
msg #91962
Ignore chetron
modified
5/3/2010 7:06:31 AM

NO, THE BELOW POST IS ONE, YOU SEE WHEN TRO WANTS TO OVERTHROW, OR INCITE OTHERS TO DO THE DIRTY WORK, THE GOVERNMENT, HE KNOWS THIS IS AGAINST THE LAW SO HE QUOTES THE BILL OF RIGHTS TO CLAIM HIS UNALIENABLE RIGHT TO DO SO. IT'S OK FOR HIM TO CLAIM THEM, JUST NO ONE ELSE CAN, FOR THINGS LIKE FREEDOM.





TheRumpledOne
- Ignore TheRumpledOne 12/9/2007 11:57:51 AM

TERRORISM:

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new guards for their future security — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. — The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.



TheRumpledOne
6,358 posts
msg #91997
Ignore TheRumpledOne
modified
5/3/2010 5:28:30 PM

Who does the BILL OF RIGHTS refer to? Anyone? US Citizens?

I still think if an illegal alien wanders onto your property, you are going to either pick up the phone to call the police or pick up a weapon and confront the trespasser. Then again you might welcome them into your home but I doubt it.

If we adopted the MEXICAN IMMIGRATION LAW, the problem would be solved... THINK ABOUT IT!!






machismo
115 posts
msg #92000
Ignore machismo
5/3/2010 6:35:04 PM

So in regards to US Citizens how is this law not going to effect only "certain", US Citizens who are Arizonian's and also Out of State Citizens ??? As there has to be “reasonable suspicion", for questioning ???

BTW there is more then just Green Card Immigrants, US issues a lot of different types of visas for business,studies, work etc, in 90 days Arizona police department is gonna get trained and have access to all these kinds of visa inquiry check that only INS has ? and that to on the spot on a traffic stop ??

petrolpeter
439 posts
msg #92022
Ignore petrolpeter
5/4/2010 4:21:05 AM

We could all be workers in Arizona.54% of Illegals use stolen identities to circumvent the mandatory E-Verify employer ID system according to Homeland Security agents.Hmm,hope their paying me enough.I think if I (here in Wisconsin)were to Swipe some one's ID,lie on an E-Verify document,lie to an employer,work for cash/not pay tax(for years) Festus would be passing me a coffee tin through the bars before long,and rightly so.

StockFetcher Forums · General Discussion · POLITICS GOES HERE<< 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 ... 75 >>Post Follow-up

*** Disclaimer *** StockFetcher.com does not endorse or suggest any of the securities which are returned in any of the searches or filters. They are provided purely for informational and research purposes. StockFetcher.com does not recommend particular securities. StockFetcher.com, Vestyl Software, L.L.C. and involved content providers shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken based on the content.


Copyright 2016 - Vestyl Software L.L.C.Terms of Service | License | Questions or comments? Contact Us
EOD Data sources: DDFPlus & CSI Data Quotes delayed during active market hours. Delay times are at least 15 mins for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and Amex. Delayed intraday data provided by DDFPlus