themako1
7 posts
msg #105535
- Ignore themako1 |
3/19/2012 4:27:46 PM
Idk I ran it over the weekend and it didnt come up. Even after today if I run the scan for up over 20% over the past 10 days it should come up and it doesn't
|
stockfetcher
979 posts
msg #105536 |
3/19/2012 4:31:30 PM
You originally did not see ONVO because you had 30 days for your "required history". Had that been set to 10 (as it is now) when originally running the filter, ONVO would have appeared (as our example illustrates.)
ONVO does appear when looking for a 20% gain; using your original syntax and adding the "apply to symlist" to focus results:
StockFetcher Support
|
themako1
7 posts
msg #105537
- Ignore themako1 |
3/19/2012 4:37:05 PM
but all you did was tell the scanner to scan for that symbol. If I want to look up just that symbol I wouldn't need this scanner. the purpose is to scan for all stocks within that criteria which that symbol still wont come up. I just did this scan "show stocks where close gained more than 10 percent over the last 10 days and price is between 1 and 10 and volume is greater than 100,000". that stock is definitly up over 10% in the last 10 days and has volume of over 100,000, but the scanner will not display it.
|
stockfetcher
979 posts
msg #105538 |
3/19/2012 4:41:39 PM
No. "apply to symlist()" simply reduces the universe of stocks that are "scanned" by your filter. If the stocks in "apply to symlist()" do not match your filter conditions, then they will not appear in the results. As an illustration:
Notice that no stocks matched the condition above; clearly ONVO's price is not above $500/sh.
In our previous examples, we are simply using "apply to symlist()" to focus on the stock you mentioned. When you run the filter to find candidates, you will likely remove that line, but that will not change whether ONVO matches your conditions or not.
StockFetcher Support
|