| StockFetcher Forums · General Discussion · Syntax question.. | << >>Post Follow-up |
| mktmole 325 posts msg #108218 - Ignore mktmole |
9/29/2012 5:07:32 PM This looks right but comes back with no hits, is there a syntax error that i'm missing? tks mm set{value1,abs(close - cma(close,200)} set{value2, value1 / Close} set{value3, value2 * 100) and value3 above 9.9 and add column value3 |
| four 5,087 posts msg #108219 - Ignore four modified |
9/29/2012 9:13:26 PM What causes these two filters to return different stocks? Remove "above 9.9" and both return the same stocks =9701. -OR- |
| Kevin_in_GA 4,599 posts msg #108220 - Ignore Kevin_in_GA |
9/29/2012 10:00:10 PM Can the count function go above 100? I think that's as high as it will go - you don't get an error message but it truncates at 100. |
| mahkoh 1,065 posts msg #108222 - Ignore mahkoh |
9/30/2012 5:26:32 PM Two issues: Your third filter line: set{value3, value2 * 100) should end with } instead of ) However, correcting this still doesn't return results The second issue is that apparently you cannot use abs(...) on a sum or a subtraction but only on a single number. |
| mktmole 325 posts msg #108230 - Ignore mktmole |
10/1/2012 12:20:39 PM Four, Kevin, mahkoh... tks kindly for your feedback. rgds mm |
| mktmole 325 posts msg #108231 - Ignore mktmole |
10/1/2012 1:06:49 PM Updated, from SF, "At this time there is a limitation when using math operations inside of a function, you must use the explicit phrase for the function (plus, minus, divide, multiply.) Only direct operations in the "set{}" statements utilize the operation symbols (+,-,/,*). ----------------------------------- thank you SF for your input. mm |
| SAFeTRADE 630 posts msg #108233 - Ignore SAFeTRADE |
10/1/2012 3:36:54 PM This is the correct coding, I think. You needed to put an extra ) in the first line of code at the end of 200). |
| Kevin_in_GA 4,599 posts msg #108235 - Ignore Kevin_in_GA |
10/1/2012 4:41:45 PM "At this time there is a limitation when using math operations inside of a function, you must use the explicit phrase for the function (plus, minus, divide, multiply.) Only direct operations in the "set{}" statements utilize the operation symbols (+,-,/,*). What an odd limitation. Why would the standard mathematical operators not work within a function? Who would have guessed this? I would have thought the opposite was more likely to be the wrong approach. The SF syntax really needs an overhaul. Ease of use does not have to mean limitations in functionality. |
| stockfetcher 979 posts msg #108236 |
10/1/2012 4:56:34 PM We agree that this limitation is rather odd; however, it is related to how the StockFetcher syntax is structured. The basic math operations were included in the based StockFetcher syntax. These were designed to match the "plain-text" syntax of StockFetcher. 
The symbol-based math operations were only added/designed with the more advanced "set{}" syntax, that was introduced later. 
StockFetcher Support |
| StockFetcher Forums · General Discussion · Syntax question.. | << >>Post Follow-up |