chetron
2,817 posts
msg #61959
- Ignore chetron |
4/30/2008 9:22:33 AM
JP/MARY INFLUENCE...
|
lfrisch
27 posts
msg #62008
- Ignore lfrisch |
5/1/2008 12:47:17 AM
This is interesting. However, you may want to find stocks with a high real time volume multiple. Try madscan free at www.madscan.com use promo code lfm100. Let me know how it works out for you.
|
chetron
2,817 posts
msg #62011
- Ignore chetron |
5/1/2008 7:20:46 AM
OR EVEN ...
|
nikoschopen
2,824 posts
msg #62015
- Ignore nikoschopen |
5/1/2008 12:11:03 PM
SET{VRANGE,INDPOSITION(HILO(2),60) * 100}
SET{VVOL,INDPOSITION(VOLUME(2),60) * 100}
Nice filter, except I ain't too sure about them "(2)" parameters. You might wanna look again.
|
chetron
2,817 posts
msg #62018
- Ignore chetron |
5/1/2008 1:21:06 PM
THE REASON I HAVE BEEN DOING THIS AUTOMATICLY, IS THAT I HAVE HAD PROBLEMS FROM DAY 1 WITH THE "INDPOSTION " MEASURE.
FOR SOME REASON, NOT TODAY, I GET ERRORS WHEN I USE CUSTOM VARIABLES WITHOUT THE ADDED TIME FRAME, WITH THE "INDPOSITION" MEASURE.
I HAVE BEEN SEEING IT DO MORE GOOD THAN HARM, IF YOU SEE SOMETHING SPECIFIC, PLEASE REVEAL.
CHIME IN IF YOU LIKE TOM.
TIA CHETRON
|
nikoschopen
2,824 posts
msg #62019
- Ignore nikoschopen |
5/1/2008 2:33:14 PM
I get the identical number of matches when I run this slightly abbreviated version. Hence, it seems that SF merely ignores the number, be it (1), (2)...or (5) for that matter.The only reason why I brought this up was because you apparently assigned a variable name "HILO" but used "HILO(2)" instead.
|