judgetrade
107 posts
msg #40051
- Ignore judgetrade |
1/8/2006 7:40:04 AM
"if qqqq > ma (200) then....
Filter criteria"
so the filter would only give results if the QQQQ is above the ma(200).
is something like this possible?
|
guru_trader
485 posts
msg #40168
- Ignore guru_trader |
1/11/2006 7:22:20 PM
Try this:
|
TheRumpledOne
6,407 posts
msg #40173
- Ignore TheRumpledOne |
1/11/2006 11:45:35 PM
This filter will only produce results when the close of the QQQQ is above its ma(200). I assumed you only wanted NASDAQ STOCKS.
I threw in the rsi(2) < 1 selection and WARM display.
HTH.
MAY ALL YOUR FILLS BE COMPLETE.
|
nikoschopen
2,824 posts
msg #40178
- Ignore nikoschopen |
1/12/2006 6:04:24 AM
While the following filter should work in theory by substituting the "filter criteria" for your own, it could get messy in practice depending on how elaborate your filter may be.
set{if,count(ind(QQQQ,close) above ind(QQQQ,MA(200)),1)}
set{then,if * "filter criteria"}
Hence if I'm looking for a stock with the closing price above EMA(50) only when QQQQ is above MA(200)...
|
TheRumpledOne
6,407 posts
msg #40194
- Ignore TheRumpledOne |
1/12/2006 3:36:31 PM
"While the following filter should work in theory by substituting the "filter criteria" for your own, it could get messy in practice depending on how elaborate your filter may be.
set{if,count(ind(QQQQ,close) above ind(QQQQ,MA(200)),1)}
set{then,if * "filter criteria"}
Hence if I'm looking for a stock with the closing price above EMA(50) only when QQQQ is above MA(200)...
"
KEEP IT SIMPLE...
No need to use set statements unless you have to.
MAY ALL YOUR FILLS BE COMPLETE.
|
judgetrade
107 posts
msg #40202
- Ignore judgetrade |
1/12/2006 6:21:25 PM
Thank you all!!! Very much!!!
|