Ray1
20 posts
msg #42430
- Ignore Ray1
modified |
3/24/2006 7:12:17 PM
I came across yephers rainbow (mma) filter. And seeing that I like to hold stocks a month or so this filter seems to be just the filter I’m looking for. I added EMA (200) increasing for last 4 weeks seem to help cut down on some of the losses. But I was wondering how could I implement the CWMA band crossing over an EMA (200)? Or the bands consolidating before a upward movement in price? Or would it really help this filter any? An example would be FNSR during mid OCT. to NOV.
Fetcher
and volume above 2000000
set{newPlot, cwma(close,3)} on plot price
and draw cwma(close,5) on plot price
and draw cwma(close,7) on plot price
and draw cwma(close,9) on plot price
and draw cwma(close,10) on plot price
and draw cwma(close,30) on plot price
and draw cwma(close,35) on plot price
and draw cwma(close,40) on plot price
and draw cwma(close,45) on plot price
and draw cwma(close,50) on plot price
and draw cwma(close,60) on plot price
and draw cwma(close,70) on plot price
and draw cwma(close,80) on plot price
and draw cwma(close,90) on plot price
and draw cwma(close,100) on plot price
and do not draw bollinger
and Close between 3 and 1
and EMA(200) increasing for the last 4 Weeks
and date offset is 63
|
TheRumpledOne
6,407 posts
msg #42436
- Ignore TheRumpledOne |
3/24/2006 7:33:36 PM
If you look closely, you'll see all you need is the min and max CEMAs.
When they cross, all the lines collapse.
JMHO.
|
WALLSTREETGENIUS
983 posts
msg #42485
- Ignore WALLSTREETGENIUS |
3/25/2006 4:40:12 PM
This is the way to get into a NEW trend early W/MMM'S.....
Here's what can happen after just 10-day's.....
RIGGS
|
mktmole
325 posts
msg #42488
- Ignore mktmole |
3/25/2006 6:36:01 PM
TRO,
When they cross, all the lines collapse.
Could filter be re-coded, simplified, just with Min and Max CEMAs cross-over and obtain same results?
Thanks.MM
|
TheRumpledOne
6,407 posts
msg #42491
- Ignore TheRumpledOne |
3/25/2006 6:57:28 PM
Yes, pretty much using the min/max gives the same results.
Usually, this technique is used for VISUAL SELECTION rather than computer filtering.
There's nothing wrong with this technique.
|
alf44
2,025 posts
msg #42495
- Ignore alf44 |
3/25/2006 8:46:32 PM
RumpledOne...
Love ya man...but we've been through this before !
For you to say..."using the min/max gives the same results"...REALLY misses the whole concept of Multiple Moving Averages ! fwiw
Whatever !!!
Regards,
alf44
|
TheRumpledOne
6,407 posts
msg #42516
- Ignore TheRumpledOne
modified |
3/26/2006 12:20:20 PM
Alf:
I said there is nothing wrong with this method and that it's usually used for VISUAL selection.
I get the concept.
Can you show me where the min/max misses what the multiple "rainbow" doesn't?
If I am not mistaken, aren't you looking for a crossover?
|
alf44
2,025 posts
msg #42524
- Ignore alf44 |
3/26/2006 1:47:00 PM
...not gonna rehash this topic here !
If you want my opinions about MMAs...go back and reread yepher's original thread !
Don't really have anything else to add to what I said there !
http://www.stockfetcher.com/stockdb/fetcher?p=forum&sub=view&fid=1002&tid=40174&start=0
Regards,
alf44
|