chetron
2,817 posts
msg #65468
- Ignore chetron
modified |
7/26/2008 8:54:01 PM
MAYBE....
ARBY,
HOW I GET MY NUMBERS IS THAT I START LOW AND INCREMENT UP AS I EVALUATE THE RESULTS. I LIKE TO INCREMENT PER THE FIB NUMBERS, 1,2,3,5,8,13,21.....
THE DEBUG TAB HELPS ME, NOT ONLY WITH SYNTAX ERRORS, WITH WHICH LINE OF CODE I SHOULD ALTER DUE TO ITS KNOCKING DOWN TOO MANY/FEW EQUITIES. HOPE THIS HELPS.
|
johnnyvento
51 posts
msg #65469
- Ignore johnnyvento |
7/26/2008 8:57:05 PM
why are you busting on me WSG?
|
johnnyvento
51 posts
msg #65472
- Ignore johnnyvento |
7/26/2008 10:07:20 PM
can anybody simplify this down to run on SF basic?
set {YUp15 , count(close 1 day ago 15 % above open 1 day ago,1)}
set {YUp15Cnt , count(YUp15 >= 1,100)}
set {gu , count(open > close 1 day ago,1)}
set {gucnt , count(gu >= 1,100)}
set {YUp15AndGU , YUp15 * gu}
set {YUp15AndGuCnt , count(YUp15AndGU >= 1,100)}
YUp15Cnt near YUp15AndGuCnt
add column YUp15Cnt {Up 15 Pct}
add column YUp15AndGuCnt {Up 15 Pct then gaps up}
add column average day range(30)
close > 1
sort column 5 descending
|
johnnyvento
51 posts
msg #65479
- Ignore johnnyvento |
7/26/2008 11:51:39 PM
This request is different than TRO's gap filter, which displays statistics for the past 100 days. I would like a filter that can check any given stock upon demand, with a variable that can be changed based on percentage gain (which could be applied back over a specified period, or a fixed period like 1 or 2 years).
I may not be able to write it, but I would highly encourage people from coming into my thread and insulting me, for that you will get my continued scorn and ridicule, since you are the one that started the conflict in the first place.
|
arby347
87 posts
msg #65480
- Ignore arby347 |
7/27/2008 12:17:32 AM
RIGGS, I was just seeing if I could do a filter from what you wrote:
"The very best way to "predict gaps" has always come off the "Bollinger(10) Squeeze." Look for squeezes that have a positive Weekly RSI(2), and make sure price or the open is near the bottom band, and also incorporate FI(2) increasing as well as Slow Stochastics(5,3)."
The ????? meant I was not sure it represented what you said. I am not sure why you need to be so unfriendly.
|
WALLSTREETGENIUS
983 posts
msg #65484
- Ignore WALLSTREETGENIUS
modified |
7/27/2008 1:40:09 AM
arby -
Relax man...this is a posting forum. There's no reason for you to wear your heart on your sleeve. You don't need me as a friend, and you know if you need help, all you have to do is ask right? So next time just ask okay?...and never expect me to be friendly....you've gotta know better then that friend!
Now, here's something that will ALWAYS be a benefit to you...If you ALWAYS follow these 4 rules when it comes to a "squeeze", then you will make a fortune in your lifetime.
1. Make sure 1 of your 2 lead indicators "COG(5,3)" or "FI(2)" are pointing up. If you have both, then you are looking at an extremely strong chance of a breakout! I use "Center of gravity" COG(5,3) instead of Stochastics, because it usually turns 1-day B-4 Sto does. Get to know this indicator, because it's turning points are usually sharp and precise.
2. Bollinger Bands(10) is as flat as a board, or converging with one another (upper & lower bands)
3. And the most important of all...WEEKLY RSI(2) IS IN AN UPTREND!!! Make sure it's NOT tailing off, and I preferable like entries when it's below 50. Any higher then that...you're risking a sharp "tail off" (conslidation), or a sharp new downtrend!
4. In these tight formations, you will almost always see a 3-5 candle formation appear. Usually it's only 1 of 3. The first is the "Mat hold", and the 2nd is the "Rising Three Methods." And the 3rd is "Bullish Kicking." When you see these formations complete...get ready for a rocket ride baby!
**** This is one of the biggest secrets in all of TA! This is the one formula that works 100% of the time! But you have to get in before the W-RSI(2) turns down. In other words...don't enter when W-RSI(2) is nearing it's upper reference line. i.e...80-99. Now, reverse the formula, and you've just landed yourself the most dynamic shorting filter you will ever lay your eyes on! Especially if it's at the top of a chart...and you'll see many. ****
Now go put it to work, and come back and tell me I'm wrong....and one other thing....to get more plays (not that you'll need em), change the "Bollinger Width(10)" to 3,4,5 or 6-Month lows etc....
((( THEMIGHTYSQUEEZE FILTER )))
|
arby347
87 posts
msg #65485
- Ignore arby347 |
7/27/2008 2:02:29 AM
RIGGS:
Thanks for all the info. I have gained a lot from your efforts/knowledge shared on these forums. OK,I can deal with your personality quirks. :)
|
WALLSTREETGENIUS
983 posts
msg #65488
- Ignore WALLSTREETGENIUS |
7/27/2008 8:30:17 AM
....it's all good arby!....
|
chetron
2,817 posts
msg #65489
- Ignore chetron |
7/27/2008 9:07:23 AM
best i could do...
your 100 counts wanted to be greater 1,can't happen, changed to .5
i noted out the "near" line. if you look at the graphs, something ain't right.
|
guru_trader
485 posts
msg #65508
- Ignore guru_trader
modified |
7/27/2008 5:24:37 PM
I just figured out that filters won't fetch if they contain "?"s
|